Sunday, April 29, 2012

Is Feeding Pets a Species Appropriate Diet Putting Them on the Same Level as Humans?

Uploaded from the Photobucket iPad App
I wrote recently about how, in the last couple of months, we've switched all three of our dogs over to a "species appropriate" raw diet. One of our dogs suffers from allergies, and the more we've learned about how crucial diet is to human health, the more sense it makes that the same applies to our pets.

A few days ago, Sarah at The Healthy Home Economist featured a guest post on the same subject. In the comments, the opinion was expressed that feeding our pets this way amounted to "putting them on the same level as humans". The thoughts I started to leave in a comment there turned into an entire blog post I wanted to share with my readers here!

To begin with, I'll briefly address the cost issue, since it seems to be a factor in this viewpoint (that we're spending as much on our pets as we do on our family members). I can say that, so far, we're spending just about the same that a fairly inexpensive, medium-quality kibble would cost to feed all three dogs. We're purchasing mostly chicken for the raw meaty bones portion. An 8 pound bag of chicken leg quarters for about $7.00 will last nearly a week. We're adding some organ meats each week, which costs another couple of dollars. The rest is scraps/leftovers/byproducts of what our family is eating (broth, fruit strained out of our water kefir, scraps, and so on), which would otherwise go to waste. Even the least expensive high-quality grain-free kibble I could find would cost us close to twice what we're spending.

So...am I putting my dogs on the same level as my family and other humans by feeding them the way God designed them to eat?

As a Christian, I believe that God is the Creator of all things and that we as humans have been given the huge responsibility of stewardship over everything on this planet. That includes all natural resources, land, plants, and animals. As good stewards, we should be the first ones speaking out on environmental issues, the humane treatment of animals, and other issues. Since this is a broad subject that would take too much room to go into in depth here, I'm going to keep the focus on feeding animals for now.

When it comes to the nutritional needs of myself and my family, I think we need to learn as much as we can about how our bodies are designed to function and work with that design. The human body is amazing, and the way God has designed and provided what it needs to thrive is amazing too! When we disregard that design, our health suffers. But even more importantly, we are not respecting God's design.

When it comes to the animals designed to provide food for us, we see a similar phenomenon. Each animal's system has been designed to run on certain types of food. When that design is disregarded, there are serious health consequences. When we eat the food produced by these animals, these consequences affect us also. And again, we're not being good stewards of what has been entrusted to us.

So, if I allow a cow to graze on grass, which is what her herbivorous system was designed by God to digest, rather than feeding her grain, corn, and all kinds of waste products, am I putting her on the same level as humans? No, I'm simply respecting her innate nature, God's design. I'm fulfilling my responsibility as a steward of creation.

The same applies to our companion animals, whether it be dogs, cats, or any other domesticated pet. Their systems are designed to run on certain types of food. When they're fed a diet consisting of things their bodies are not equipped to properly assimilate, there will be health consequences. We've been charged with properly caring for these creatures. If we're disregarding that in the name of cost and convenience, we're failing at the task we've been given.

I strongly believe that, in order to fulfill our God-given responsibility to be stewards of his creation, we must respect God's design and cooperate with it. Joel Salatin has expressed this in terms of livestock as letting the chickens express their "chickenness" or the pigs express their "pigness"...in other words, letting animals live the way God designed them to live! So, we should also let dogs express their "dogness", cats express their "catness", and so on.

In my opinion, when we are well aware that God designed a dog to be a carnivore, and yet we feed our dogs a corn and grain based diet, we are being disrespectful of that design. We're disregarding our obligation to be good stewards. I'm not saying that anyone who feeds their dogs typical commercial kibble is necessarily being deliberately disrespectful of God's design. Most of us (including myself for many years) really don't stop to think about it. We don't realize there are other options, or that what we're doing is unnatural. It's the only way we know. Much like many of us have done when it comes to our own nutrition and the Standard American Diet. But once we do realize, once we're aware of how very unnatural this way of doing things is, we should attempt to align ourselves more closely with God's design! If we have the information and the means, and do nothing, what does that say?

No one will do it perfectly, but we're responsible for what we do with that knowledge. We can do the best we can with what's available to us. Our family has very limited time and funds. In a perfect world, if cost wasn't an object and it was readily available, my dogs would eat only grassfed meat that has been raised in a species-appropriate way that honors their God-given design. They don't. They eat a mix of conventional meat from the grocery store and local, humanely-raised, grassfed meat. That's what's available to us, so that's what we do. It's not perfect, but it's lightyears closer to what their bodies are designed to eat than kibble filled with corn, grain, and all kinds of chemicals and byproducts.

Are my pets on a level with my family and other humans? Absolutely not. They are loved and are members of our family, but they are not eternal souls created in God's image. They are, however, part of God's creation, designed by Him, and we should strive to respect and cooperate with that design as far as we are able. The greater health that they will almost certainly enjoy is definitely a factor, but even more important to me is knowing that we're doing our best to be good stewards and cooperate with God's design for his creatures.

Feeding my dogs a species-appropriate diet that cooperates with the digestive system God designed for them is an act of respect for his design and worship to him, not an unhealthy elevation of the animals to a human level.

That's my .02.

What are your thoughts?


Linked with Monday ManiaReal Food WednesdaySimple Lives Thursday, and Fight Back Friday.


Pin It


10 comments:

  1. Yeah its really a good ultimate diet and I have lose my weight upto 5 pound in a month its so perfect for the persons on diet…

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting. I never thought much about it, but it makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think theres anything wrong with putting animals and humans on the same level. I love my cats and don't make any secret of it. If we are moral people why would we allow an animal to be in pain and suffering?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for the great article! We feed our dogs raw and have been accused of the same things, but I desire to do the best for my dogs that God has enabled me to do. I thank him for the blessing I have received throught owning pets. Your article explained it very well, I thank you for taking the time to post it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Totally agree with your article. We have been feeding a raw diet to our dogs for years. Like you I wish we could fed all organic meat but we do have to make choices and do the best we can. I too have found that it really isn't any more expensive than feeding a good quality processed dog food and actually cheaper than the premium brands. What people also don't take into consideration is the amount you save in vet bills. As I mentioned on your previous article on this topic, we just put one of our dogs down at 17 1/2. She hadn't been to a vet in more than 6 years. That's a huge savings. We also need to be responsible for the animals we choose to bring into our lives. If we can't take care of them properly we shouldn't have them. Love your idea of the feeding them the fruit out of water kefir.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is a point well made! I too agree with both the idea of stewardship and with the point that critics often fail to do the math - in the long run, feeding any person or animal well is going to be less expensive than paying in time and money to handle the illnesses, allergies and other fall out of a bad diet.

    I found you through The Healthy Home Economist's page and will be looking back through your previous posts as we have been exploring the option of non-kibble diet for our beloved border collie and I want to make sure I do it correctly. Thanks for this!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Excellent thoughts... and very well expressed. Thanks for sharing them with us. :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well said! I feed my cat grain free kibble (which is expensive) while transitioning her to raw food. Her previous home had her addicted to the kibble, but we are making progress. I don't think that feeding my cat a species appropriate diet makes her human...I think it makes her a cat. Feeding her by-products of mass production of human food, when she can't digest it, would be inhumane in my eyes. Plus, I'm with Kelli. I don't have a problem admitting that I love my cat like a family member and would never give her food that was bad for her just because it's convenient for me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have been feeding our Great Pyrenees a "prey model" based diet for the past month. It costs the same as the dry dog food I was buying for him and it certainly suits him better. I have also started my cats on the same type of diet. In doing this I think it's, like you said, being a good steward of animals that I have in my care. And like you, I don't think that being good stewards, like God commanded us to be, means that I think my dog is human (though I think sometimes *he* thinks he is!). It seems that whenever something is "new" that people can get bristly about it. (though this way of feeding animals isn't new at all, it's not like kibble has been around all that long!)

    ReplyDelete
  10. it shocks me that ANYONE in the real food movement might even consider that it is OK to feed an animal something it wasn't designed to eat? Grass fed cows are healthier beings and thus healthier for us to consume because that is their natural diet. the same is said for chickens Simply because we choose not to eat cats and dogs does that mean they should be forced to eat the highly processed junk food that the real food (slow food, whole food) movement aspires to shun?? wow.

    As someone who had two cats block with urinary crystals and one come down with diabetes while being fed a species inappropriate food, and who had their conditions clear up on a species appropriate food, and who fostered several other diabetic cats who went into remission with the right foods, I can tell you first hand with scientific data (I home test the blood glucose levels of diabetic cats) that the right food makes all the difference!

    Thank you for your post! It is great to see the word getting out.

    ReplyDelete

I really appreciate you taking the time to leave me a note! It makes my day!

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
My Photo
I'm a mom of four, ranging from teenager to preschooler. My roles include home educator, spiritual advisor, home manager, nutritionist, financial planner, and event coordinator, to name just a few. In my free time (ha!), I love to read. "Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God." (1 Cor. 10:31) is a life verse for our family. Home With Purpose is a place for me to share what we're learning and doing in every aspect of our home to work toward that goal.
 Online Users
Parenting Blogs
MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected
Photobucket
Home With Purpose
Powered by Blogger.

  © Blogger template 'External' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008 tweaked by Relevant Designs. Graphics from Fotolia.com.

Back to TOP  

Google Analytics Alternative